Latest News!
Written By
Comment Count
Comment Last Three
This week, President Obama asks Congress to spend another $50 billion--$50 billion that can only come from additional deficit spending—to bail out state and local governments.
After spending trillions on predictably failed attempts to bail out the economy, for which we have nothing to show but a river of red ink and an unemployment rate stuck just below ten percent, the last thing our country can afford is to spend billions more on government programs.
To the surprise of no one, nothing has been heard on the most recent attempt to spend our country into prosperity from Congressman Jason Altmire . . . which is just the latest example of his failure to exercise any leadership on the issues facing the country.
Political debate is nothing new in America. From the decades before the Civil War—when duels between those representing opposing sides were not unheard of—until today, passions have run high in every decade.
The reason is simple: nothing is more central to our political system than the right to free and unfettered debate on the topic of the day, whether that is the establishment of the first national bank or the war in Afghanistan.
The other constant across the decades has been that that right was secured first and foremost by the willingness of American service members to lay down their lives to protect it. On this holiday, born in the aftermath of a terrible civil war that laid out a new and better notion of what America means as a country, I ask that each of you take a moment to thank a veteran for the liberty he or she has helped safeguard.
Since September, we built a coalition of volunteers, raised money, knocked on doors, and took our message to the voters.
The result was distinct: we carried each of the six counties in the district and won more than two-thirds of the vote overall.
This is not my victory: it is yours. Your hard work, your commitment, and your determination to build a better future for our country all paid off in this victory—and what we accomplished this month is only the dress rehearsal for our victory in November.
From the bottom of our hearts, my family and I thank each of you for your unswerving commitment to our nation’s future. I hope that each of you will enjoy this holiday weekend with a joy tempered by the recollection of those who over more than two centuries have laid down their lives for our freedoms.
So how did we get here - to this wayward form of "governing"? We arrived here through 100 years of progressively increasing central government, constructed by Democrats and so-called moderate Republicans. Their power hunger and fiscal irresponsibility, enabled by activist judicial decisions that spit in the face of the 10th amendment, has turned our country into something our forefathers never would have envisioned.
That reality prompted my run for Congress. I am a conservative who will stand on principle, tell the voters what I plan to do, and won't veer off that course for job security or personal gain. How many public officials do you know who live by that code of ethics? If more did, opinions of public officials would soar. If Republicans did this, respect for smaller, less expensive government would soar as well.
I am committed to cutting government spending and central government control. You have my word.
I'm thankful for all of your hard work on my behalf, and for getting the word out about my campaign. If we keep this incredible momentum rolling, we'll be one step closer to reinstating the country our founding fathers envisioned.
I do not know to whom these journalists are talking, but it is not the hundreds of people—Republicans, Democrats, and Independents alike—I have met in the last week. These voters are not prepared to simply shrug their shoulders and forget about this multi-trillion dollar calamity as if a government takeover of health care were of no more significance than the defeat of a favored team in the NCAA tournament.
They want to see this terrible bill repealed, and so do I.
I was the first candidate in this race to pledge to work for the repeal of ObamaCare. If I am elected, that will be my first priority. Jason Altmire may have been allowed to cast a “no” vote on this bill by Nancy Pelosi, but no one has suggested that he will lift a finger to roll back this monstrosity. Nor can any sensible person imagine that my primary opponent, a career federal employee and no stranger to the expansion of federal power, is really going to work as a matter of principle to eliminate this trillion-dollar boondoggle.
I am heartened by what I have heard in the last few days: if we work hard to elect principled conservatives in November, we can undo a wrong-headed and potentially calamitous piece of legislation.
The last week has been an exciting one for our campaign. There is no question that the people of western Pennsylvania are deeply concerned about the direction in which the Democrats are leading our country. Everywhere I have gone this week, I have sensed a growing confidence that this year we can—and must—elect people this November who will take the lead against the radical agenda of President Obama and Nancy Pelosi.
At the same time, I can tell you that there is a growing awareness that there is a real contrast between the two candidates in the Republican primary. I am not a career federal employee, hoping to move up another step on the political ladder. I put my career on hold to run for this seat for one reason: the stakes for our country are just too high for those who care about the future of the United States to do nothing.
The professional politicians of both parties have failed us—and every day I am encouraged by the voters I meet who are determined to elect a real conservative this fall.
What’s more, we collected those signatures in the midst of the worst winter western Pennsylvania has seen in a generation.
I am honored by the confidence so many people have placed in me--and each day, I am more confident that the people of our region want to see principled leadership and fundamental reform in Washington. The stakes are too high for our country’s future to be left in the hands of career politicians from either party.
NOT included in this legislation are already existing protections against taxpayer funding of abortion, which are supported by 70% of Americans. These protections have been in place for decades, and pro-abortion advocates are using the Senate Bill to attempt to force American Taxpayers to fund a practice of which they overwhelmingly disapprove. Congressman Altmire claims to be Pro-Life, yet over and over again his votes do not match his words.
Western Pennsylvania deserves better. We deserve someone who is not afraid to lead and who will put the interests of the people over the interests of Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama. I look forward to taking on that challenge.
Question: How does a Congressman who votes for two consecutive $1.5 Trillion budget deficits, an $800 billion failed stimulus package and another $150 billion "jobs" stimulus get to claim to be a blue dog fiscal conservative?
Answer: When he becomes a professional politician and he thinks the people back home aren't paying attention.
We are paying attention, and in November, we will let him know.
- http://gongfu.com.ua - Visit us or die! iojulmvcc
- In the news yesterday the Dems were actually happy to hear that $35k people had lost their jobs. Is this progress? Remove the shackles from the private sector and let us all enjoy prosperity and be less dependent on government! Stop the Dems from taking over a fifth of the nation's economy with their health care takeover!
- by drilling for just oil,our country can create more empolyment in steel mills [need of pipe], truckers [to delivery the pipe],people [to drill],all good paying empolyment with benefits. coal, will put people to work building machinery to extract the product. these two items can also be exported. helps our trade balance. it will create[oh my god] wealth. I forgot we need miners.
In this economic environment, it would be a mistake to let the tax cuts of 2001 and 2003 expire. I am the first candidate running for Congress in the Fourth District who has signed American for Tax Reform’s pledge not to raise taxes. I will fight to keep taxes low and to lower taxes on capital gains and corporations, which today pay the second highest rate of tax in the world. Lower taxes help the job creators, and that's what we need in this economy!
On health care, the incumbent described four options before Congress:
(i) do nothing and let the proposed bills die; (ii) have the House pass the Senate bill as is; (iii) attempt a reconciliation between and the House and Senate bills; or (iv) attempt incremental steps.
He missed option 5: Start over, and pass legislation to (a) permit marketing of health plans across state lines; (b) enact tax equity for those who purchase health insurance on their own instead of getting through their employer; (c) promote health savings accounts; and (d) promote medical malpractice reform. Altmire missed this option because he actually voted against these private sector, market-based reforms on the same day Nancy Pelosi let him vote against her bill. Since then, Altmire has favorably commented on the Senate bill, which is just another heavy-handed, big government takeover, with a few special favors thrown in for Nebraska, Louisiana and South Florida.
I will fight any government takeover of our health care, and am the first person running for Congress in the Fourth District to sign the Club for Growth's pledge to repeal Obamacare if it passes. I will also fight for the common sense reforms outlined above.
- YZVmEp whxlfcwjrkcs, [url=http://hxmjqcbvbnzb.com/]hxmjqcbvbnzb[/url], [link=http://ruoaghrptmly.com/]ruoaghrptmly[/link], http://fgrtpcjzaago.com/
- ODWYZA jpopfncuixee, [url=http://jwwipfvprtrc.com/]jwwipfvprtrc[/url], [link=http://hkmdizuuwwrp.com/]hkmdizuuwwrp[/link], http://fkareilzldll.com/
- KnwW76 xjmaxxuxgvny, [url=http://yfoelytrztus.com/]yfoelytrztus[/url], [link=http://oydfeanbidfe.com/]oydfeanbidfe[/link], http://mpammilccmoi.com/
Michael Manzo, ex-chief of staff for former House Minority Leader Bill DeWeese, said Veon approved the bonuses from 2004-06 and is convinced DeWeese knew about the program, though he testified he never had "explicitly" discussed it with DeWeese.
"I could always be much more direct with Mike," Manzo said. That stemmed, in part, from the fact DeWeese "was not a hands-on guy," Manzo testified.
Veon, 53, who represented his Beaver County district for 20 years, is accused of overseeing a secret $1.4 million bonus system paid for by taxpayers to motivate staffers to work on campaigns.
Three of Veon's former aides also are charged in the case being prosecuted by Attorney General Tom Corbett's office — Annamarie Peretta-Rosepink, 47, a former district office manager in Beaver Falls; Brett Cott, 37, a former policy aide in Harrisburg; and Stephen Keefer, 39, the ex-director of House Democrats' information technology department.
All are charged with multiple felonies of theft, conspiracy and conflict of interest.
Manzo, the prosecution's star witness, said he and former administrator Scott Brubaker recommended bonus amounts and got Veon's approval. Brubaker then informed DeWeese, Manzo said.
DeWeese, charged with crimes in a separate case, denies knowledge of bonuses for campaign work.
After Republican Jim Marshall defeated Veon in the general election, Veon approved bonuses for campaign work before leaving office Nov. 30, Manzo said.
"Mike set the amounts for his staff. It was my suggestion for everybody else," said Manzo, who struck a plea agreement and is cooperating with prosecutors.
Prosecutors reduced charges against Manzo and his wife Rachel, who also was charged and entered a guilty plea.
Commonwealth witnesses with plea agreements who will testify against the defendants are "liars" who are in a "cover your butt mode," said attorney Bryan Walk, who is representing Cott.
Prosecutors began presenting e-mails as evidence intended to show Veon approved the bonuses.
The defense is focused on showing DeWeese as the higher-ranking leader behind the bonuses.
The attorney for Peretta-Rosepink admitted that campaign activity occurred in Veon's Beaver Falls office but said his client had no authority to approve bonuses.
"I understand there was campaigning in the Beaver County office — I can't deny that," said Michael Palermo, a Carlisle attorney. "I assure you she didn't have the authority to award anybody a bonus."
Palermo said Peretta-Rosepink worked 60 to 80 hours a week. "Nobody is going to say the taxpayers of Pennsylvania didn't get 120 percent from Annamarie Peretta-Rosepink," Palermo said.
Walk said there are no e-mails showing Cott authorized bonuses.
"Politics, legislating and campaigning are like a big ball of yarn," Walk said.
Cott spearheaded an effort that knocked Green Party candidate Carl Romanelli off the ballot in the 2006 U.S. Senate race, an effort Democrats believed would help Sen. Robert Casey. Prosecutors say it was paid for with tax money.
"Brett did exactly what he was asked to do," Walk said.
"Tom Corbett has a stake in this case," Walk said, starting to refer to Corbett's bid for the Republican nomination for governor, before Judge Richard Lewis interrupted him.
"Let's move on," Lewis said.
"I don't need to tell you why they need a conviction," Walk said. "You know why."
Veon's lawyers have said the bonus investigation is politically motivated by Corbett's effort to increase his standing with voters. Corbett said the case is based on a state grand jury's recommendation.
Veon was one of 12 Democrats charged in July 2008. Seven pleaded guilty this month.
A jury last month acquitted former Rep. Sean Ramaley of Baden, accused of holding a "ghost job" in Veon's office.
In November, 10 Republicans, including former House Speaker John Perzel of Philadelphia, were charged with diverting $10 million in tax money for sophisticated computer systems to give the GOP an edge in elections. Perzel said he is innocent.
Read Full Article Here:
http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/news/regional/s_665223.html
- p6GimL vzgtedidwezr, [url=http://bqnrgnmhbqdl.com/]bqnrgnmhbqdl[/url], [link=http://xbjioftqsfko.com/]xbjioftqsfko[/link], http://dlxjqeggocbt.com/
- V8UM13 tqskdyzckfsi, [url=http://qtcxryztlztw.com/]qtcxryztlztw[/url], [link=http://chgnruttwgco.com/]chgnruttwgco[/link], http://rqhdrujtdknr.com/
- t8oNBH ljzpydwhjdue, [url=http://yhajxzcpaoxz.com/]yhajxzcpaoxz[/url], [link=http://sszcjsieshty.com/]sszcjsieshty[/link], http://tppohvasxkfe.com/
Mr. Specter acknowledged that the results of the Massachusetts Senate race had dealt a blow not just to the administration’s health care initiative, but to the Employee Free Choice Act, a measure that national labor leaders had called their top priority in the new administration.
The proposal, also known as “card check,” is designed to make it easier for unions to organize new workplaces. In its original version, one key provision — a lightning rod for its critics — would have recognized a union’s right to negotiate a contract if a majority of workers signed cards affirming their desire to be represented. That could have supplanted the current requirement for a secret ballot election.
Among other labor law reforms, the bill would have created an arbitration system for contracts when management and newly recognized bargaining units fail to reach timely agreement on a new contract.
The measure has been intertwined with Mr. Specter’s remarkable political year. In the last Congress, he was the only Republican senator who voted to have it considered on the Senate floor. Last March, while still a Republican, the incumbent sought to counter conservative criticism in announcing that he would oppose the bill. That was only weeks before his stunning decision to switch to the Democratic Party. In the face of fierce union lobbying to back the measure, he has said that he was working with other senators to craft a compromise bill that would attract the 60 votes needed for passage. That was a legislative challenge even before the loss of the Kennedy seat in Massachusetts as several conservative Democrats had indicated that they would not support the bill’s original language.
In September, as he addressed the AFL-CIO’s national convention in Pittsburgh, Mr. Specter expressed confidence a that a compromise version would be enacted, one that preserved the secret ballot in organizing election.
On Monday, as he showcased the support of several union locals in news conference in the Uptown headquarters of the Laborers’ District Council of Western Pennsylvania, Mr. Specter said that things had changed.
While Mr. Specter appeared pessimistic about the bill’s chances, officials at the U.S. Chamber of Commerce — which vehemently opposes the bill — said they still expect a floor vote.
Mr. Specter spoke yesterday on a conference call to tout a new poll conducted by the chamber, which, he said, showed that 61 percent of nationwide respondents oppose EFCA — with 48 percent saying they strongly oppose.
Of those polled, 52 percent said they oppose making it easier for workers to unionize in general and 61 percent opposed a compromise provision advocated by Mr. Specter on contract negotiations in which an arbitrator selects the “last best offer” of either management or the union.
Read Full Article Here:
http://www.politicspa.com/specter-says-pro-union-bill-is-in-jeopardy/6009/
- 8VXWeE xlvppcnqsryd, [url=http://wplqurbsnsxo.com/]wplqurbsnsxo[/url], [link=http://grlbcmkwqlak.com/]grlbcmkwqlak[/link], http://cnypzxfkmsby.com/
- Dad9Uh vaqnxygrfoxx, [url=http://vcvlqoohpbdp.com/]vcvlqoohpbdp[/url], [link=http://fidjthakerzt.com/]fidjthakerzt[/link], http://zizvpykhxatq.com/
- ow8ubA drlfnsthwwbb, [url=http://keizrbwzmonw.com/]keizrbwzmonw[/url], [link=http://bvdtswiyidoz.com/]bvdtswiyidoz[/link], http://yleoubggnqoi.com/